Finance

What Ghana’s AI Policy Could Learn from Rwanda, Senegal, and Egypt

Ghana Cannot Afford to Delay: Lessons from Rwanda, Senegal, and Egypt for a National AI Policy Artificial Intelligence is no longer a distant aspiration. It is fast becoming the most critical driver of productivity, competitiveness, and governance transformation. The African Union estimates that...

The High Street Journal

published: Aug 12, 2025

Blog Image

Ghana Cannot Afford to Delay: Lessons from Rwanda, Senegal, and Egypt for a National AI Policy

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is no longer a distant aspiration. It is fast becoming the most critical driver of productivity, competitiveness, and governance transformation. The African Union estimates that AI and other Fourth Industrial Revolution technologies could add $1.3 trillion to Africa’s GDP by 2030 (PwC, 2022). Yet, as this opportunity emerges, African nations are not moving at the same speed.

Ghana has pockets of excellence, research groups, private sector pilots, and enthusiastic startups, but it has no comprehensive, resourced national AI strategy. This is not just a gap. It is a risk.

As the Ministry of Communications and Digitalisation, NITA, and other stakeholders begin conversations about a future AI policy, Ghana has an opportunity to learn from the deliberate and well-funded strategies of three African peers: Rwanda, Senegal, and Egypt.

Rwanda: Vision Anchored in Institutions

Rwanda has built a clear institutional architecture for AI governance and adoption, which gives coherence to its digital transformation agenda.

  • Centre for the Fourth Industrial Revolution (C4IR): Established in 2022 in partnership with the World Economic Forum, Kigali hosts Africa’s first C4IR, with AI as a priority focus.
  • CMU-Africa: Through Carnegie Mellon University Africa, Rwanda has built a pipeline of advanced AI and data science talent.
  • Priority Sectors: AI research and deployment are concentrated in healthcare, agriculture, and public services, aligning tech with national development goals.

This clarity is paying off. Rwanda is now a continental convening hub for conversations about AI ethics, data protection, and public-private experimentation.

What Ghana should take away:
AI policy must have a single empowered lead institution. Today, Ghana’s AI ecosystem is fragmented, spread across ministries, universities, and private initiatives. A National AI Policy Office, operating like Rwanda’s C4IR, could consolidate responsibility and attract international funding and partnerships.

Senegal: Building Regional Leadership and Data Infrastructure

Senegal has approached AI from a regional perspective, positioning Dakar as a Francophone Africa hub for AI innovation.

  • Dakar AI and Big Data Hub: Funded by the African Development Bank in 2023 to accelerate AI-driven innovation.
  • Diamniadio Data Center: A state-of-the-art facility to keep data local and sovereign, a precondition for advanced AI model training.
  • Francophone Networks: Senegal has built strong cross-border communities for AI knowledge-sharing and regulatory alignment.

These moves are strategic. Data is the fuel of AI, and regional collaboration ensures scale.

What Ghana should take away:
AI does not stop at national borders. Ghana could become the Anglophone counterpart to Senegal’s Francophone leadership, spearheading ECOWAS-level AI data-sharing agreements, joint AI sandboxes, and shared supercomputing resources.

This would not only help Ghana but also reduce the cost of AI infrastructure across West Africa.

Egypt: Investment in Scale and Skills

Egypt’s National AI Strategy (2021–2026) offers a masterclass in ambition matched with investment:

  • Skills: Over 15 universities now have AI-focused degree programs. The Egyptian AI Talent initiative trains 5,000 professionals annually.
  • Sectoral Projects: From AI-powered traffic management in Cairo to AI-assisted irrigation systems in the Nile Delta.
  • International Partnerships: Egypt collaborates with global AI companies and universities, embedding research into national projects.

The message is clear: Without people and infrastructure, there is no AI ecosystem.

What Ghana should take away:
Ghana has a young, educated population, but there is no national-scale plan to train thousands in AI-related skills each year.
This must change if we are to have Ghanaian-owned IP and AI solutions, rather than being perpetual consumers of imported systems. 

The Four Pillars Ghana Must Urgently Build

To avoid being left behind, Ghana’s AI policy must rest on four foundational pillars:

  1. Institutional Coordination: Establish a National AI Policy Office with the power to coordinate ministries, academia, and industry.
  2. Regional Collaboration: Position Ghana as a regional leader for Anglophone AI collaboration in ECOWAS and AfCFTA digital initiatives.
  3. Skills and Infrastructure Investment: Fund AI talent development programs, AI-focused university departments, data centers, and public-private research partnerships.
  4. Ethics, Trust, and Inclusion: Create regulatory frameworks for AI bias, privacy, accountability, and inclusion, ensuring that AI serves all communities, not just elites.

The Window is Narrow

Africa’s AI race is already underway. Those who move early to create the enabling environment for innovation will dominate markets, attract global partnerships, and set ethical norms. Ghana must choose whether to be a consumer of AI solutions or a creator of them.

Rwanda, Senegal, and Egypt are showing us that success comes from clarity, coordination, and courage.

If Ghana acts now, it can join that league.
If it delays, the gap will only widen.

Read More
Innovation
African Union
AI policy
Artificial Intelligence

Stay in the loop

Never miss out on the latest insights, trends, and stories from Cedi Life! Be the first to know when we publish new articles by subscribing to our alerts.