Prof. Peter Quartey cautions Ghanaian youth against calls for military rule

No matter how weak our democracy is, let us embrace it and make it better. It is dangerous to wish to live under military rule.

The above is the counsel Professor Peter Quartey, Director of the Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research (ISSER) at the University of Ghana, has given Ghanaian youth, urging them to reject calls for military rule, despite growing frustrations with democratic governance.

Speaking at the launch of the 7th edition of ISSER’s Ghana Social Development Outlook in Accra on Thursday, Prof. Quartey addressed concerns over poor democratic accountability and recent public sentiments, particularly among the youth, calling for a return to military governance.

He said while military rule may seem like a quick fix, it is not a viable alternative, pointing out that many young people calling for it have not experienced the realities of life under military regimes.

Prof Quartey said under military rule, there were curfews, restrictions on movement, and widespread human rights violations and cautioned that the freedoms we enjoy today—freedom of speech, association, and action—would be lost.

Prof. Quartey acknowledged the shortcomings in Ghana’s democratic system but stressed the importance of preserving and improving it.

He said no matter how weak our democracy may appear, we must work to strengthen it, rather than discard it.

While he said he would never recommend military rule for any country, he called it archaic and undemocratic, citing economic data also to reinforce his point

He said that periods of military coups in Ghana’s history often coincided with negative or stagnant GDP growth. “Is that the kind of development we want?” he asked.

Prof. Quartey recommended a national effort to educate the youth on the country’s history with military regime, saying perhaps we need to revisit documentaries and records of Ghana’s military past and share them widely.

He called on policymakers and civil society to make democracy more responsive and inclusive, in order to win back public trust and dissuade calls for authoritarian alternatives.

Read More